Bugs fixes in "openssl"
| Origin | Bug number | Title | Date fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE | CVE-2019-1547 | Normally in OpenSSL EC groups always have a co-factor present and this is used in side channel resistant code paths. However, in some cases, it is po | 2020-05-28 |
| CVE | CVE-2019-1563 | In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very l | 2020-05-28 |
| CVE | CVE-2019-1551 | There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analy | 2020-05-28 |
| CVE | CVE-2019-1547 | Normally in OpenSSL EC groups always have a co-factor present and this is used in side channel resistant code paths. However, in some cases, it is po | 2020-05-28 |
| CVE | CVE-2019-1563 | In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very l | 2020-05-28 |
| CVE | CVE-2019-1551 | There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analy | 2020-05-28 |
| CVE | CVE-2019-1547 | Normally in OpenSSL EC groups always have a co-factor present and this is used in side channel resistant code paths. However, in some cases, it is po | 2020-05-28 |
| CVE | CVE-2019-1563 | In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very l | 2020-05-28 |
| CVE | CVE-2019-1551 | There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analy | 2020-05-28 |
| CVE | CVE-2019-1547 | Normally in OpenSSL EC groups always have a co-factor present and this is used in side channel resistant code paths. However, in some cases, it is po | 2020-05-28 |
| CVE | CVE-2020-1967 | Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function ... | 2020-04-22 |
| Launchpad | 1832919 | installed libssl1.1:amd64 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10 | 2019-08-20 |
| Launchpad | 1832919 | installed libssl1.1:amd64 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10 | 2019-07-15 |
| Launchpad | 1832919 | installed libssl1.1:amd64 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10 | 2019-06-20 |
| Launchpad | 1832659 | openssl 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.1 contains upstream bug 7350 | 2019-06-20 |
| Launchpad | 1832421 | openssl reboot needed message using incorrect path to X server | 2019-06-20 |
| Launchpad | 1832659 | openssl 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.1 contains upstream bug 7350 | 2019-06-14 |
| Launchpad | 1832421 | openssl reboot needed message using incorrect path to X server | 2019-06-14 |
| CVE | CVE-2019-1543 | ChaCha20-Poly1305 is an AEAD cipher, and requires a unique nonce input for every encryption operation. RFC 7539 specifies that the nonce value (IV) s | 2019-06-14 |
| Launchpad | 1832522 | openssl maintainer scripts do not trigger services restart | 2019-06-14 |
About
-
Send Feedback to @ubuntu_updates
